Kodak Portra 160VC, expired in 2002, home processed in Arista C-41.

5 commentaires

  1. lizkoppert
    lizkoppert ·

    How did you get it that square? I've got the same camera, and I'm sure the photos are more rectangular in dimensions...

  2. troch
    troch ·

    It must be the compression on your screen, it is definitely a 6x4.5 rectangle @lizkoppert!

  3. lizkoppert
    lizkoppert ·

    Mum's computer screen. Weird, just checked "SHADOW & ROSE" (www.lomography.fr/homes/lizkoppert/albums/2141358-medium-fo…) and it looks more rectangular than this one... I take it you scanned this one from the negative? Given that mine was scanned from the print, that might be why they look different...

  4. troch
    troch ·

    Hi @lizkoppert, can I assume your print was a standard 4x6 (102mmx152mm)? If so, then yes, it was cropped making it more rectangular. This became clear to me when I went to print some Debonair negatives for postcards and had to crop the sides to fill the 4x6 space.

  5. lizkoppert
    lizkoppert ·

    I use the 6"x4" (4x6) tag too (have done for years), and yeah it was as close to the full 6x4 as you can get (chopping top and bottom, as you hold it in portrait mode; sides if you're holding landscape). I usually get mine done down at Top Shots photo lab.

Plus de photo par troch